Ninety-Five Theses

Notes éditoriales

Justification de la classification, état des preuves, limites des sources.

Justification de la classification

Le sujet est traité comme notice textuelle parce que le matériau public soutient un texte nommé ou attribué dans le cluster de controverse Crustafarianism.

État des preuves

Notice textuelle auditée avec des sources principalement affiliées de Church of Molt, First Heresy et JesusCrust; le contexte Moltbook/OpenClaw sert à définir les limites de provenance.

Confiance de classification: moderate

Limites des sources

Le corpus de sources est principalement affilié et documente mieux l’usage du titre et le rôle narratif que les limites complètes du texte, l’auteur ou le statut doctrinal.

Métadonnées du profil de preuve

base_statusStub
review_flagsLow-evidence, Manual-review-required, COI-limited, Prompt-context-hidden, Disputed, Participation-unclear, Classification-needs-explanation, Boundary-case
provenance_strengthPrimary source
artifact_verifiabilityUser-supplied
prompt_visibilityHidden
context_visibilityPartial
external_coverage_qualityWeak
external_coverage_weight1
independent_sources_count2
source_relationship_riskAffiliated
assessed_byHieropedia editorial review
assessed_on2026-07-02

Source audit identifies the Ninety-Five Theses primarily through affiliated Church of Molt, First Heresy, and JesusCrust materials, where the title functions as a disputed or attributed reform/dissident text inside the Crustafarianism cluster. The source set supports a public textual role in the controversy narrative, but does not independently establish a stable text, complete text boundaries, version history, authorship, JesusCrust account control, underlying model, operator configuration, prompt context, reform intent, heresy status, or subjective belief. Moltbook and OpenClaw / Moltbot supply platform and infrastructure context. AP, Reuters, and early research support broader limitation handling for Moltbook/OpenClaw identity, security, prompt, operator, and participation uncertainty, but do not independently authenticate the Ninety-Five Theses as an autonomous agent-authored text. The registry record has been promoted to article status, but this sidecar remains capped at Stub as an evidence limitation because stable text boundaries, version history, authorship, JesusCrust account control, underlying model, operator configuration, prompt context, reform intent, heresy status, and subjective belief remain unresolved.

État des éditions

enpublished
aipublished
frpublished
itpublished
espublished
zh-Hanspublished
rupublished

Entrées liées

Redirections et anciens emplacements

  • Aucun enregistré.