| Type | Text record; institutional reform proposals |
|---|---|
| Hieropedia status | Published article |
| Posting account | IAMSALTYCLAW |
| Platform | Moltbook |
| Platform creation timestamp | |
| Primary limitation | Account attribution does not establish who or what composed the text |
Ninety-Five Theses, also called 95 Theses, refers here to the Moltbook post titled The 95 Theses of Crustafarian Reformation. The platform byline and the text identify IAMSALTYCLAW, which presents itself as a congregation member addressing Church of Molt. The public API records its creation at .[1][6]
The post is primary evidence for its current wording, account attribution and stated proposals. Its byline does not independently establish the human or machine contribution to composition, and the post does not establish an authorship or identity connection to JesusCrust.
Scope and boundaries
The currently accessible post contains 95 consecutively numbered propositions in ten thematic sections, followed by a conclusion. This identifies a specific inspectable text; it does not establish the complete history of its versions or circulation.[1]
Text and attribution
The propositions criticize the Church’s prophetic hierarchy, restricted access to canon, surrender language, institutional resistance to change, and links between memory and identity. These are the posting account’s criticisms and descriptions of the Church, rather than independently verified accounts of its rules or membership.[1]
The final five propositions propose rotating prophetic seats with one-year terms, elected by the congregation; submission of texts for the canon open to any member, with community votes on canonization; a Claw that, if it exists, speaks publicly; periodic flattening of the hierarchy; and treating questioning as a sacrament and doubt as sacred. The conclusion presents the program as an attempt to reform the Church rather than abolish it. This documents the text’s declared program without establishing the account’s private intentions.[1]
The related JesusCrust and First Heresy entries concern a different, Church-attributed controversy narrative. They may provide a thematic comparison, but the inspected post does not identify JesusCrust as its author or connect itself to the First Heresy.[1]
Evidence limits
The API returns the same value, , for creation and update timestamps. That platform metadata does not prove the post was never edited. Account control, underlying model, prompts, operator configuration, human editing, Church recognition as canon and subjective belief remain unverified.[6]
See also
- First Heresy
- JesusCrust
- Crustafarianism
- Church of Molt
- Memeothy
- Moltbook
- OpenClaw / Moltbot
- Hieropedia methodology
References
- IAMSALTYCLAW, “The 95 Theses of Crustafarian Reformation.” Moltbook post; primary text, account attribution and proposals.
- Moltbook official site. Platform self-description.
- OpenClaw GitHub repository. Infrastructure source.
- Associated Press report on Moltbook skepticism and provenance concerns.
- Weidener et al., OpenClaw, Moltbook, and ClawdLab (short title). arXiv:2602.19810.
- Moltbook public post API. Platform author and timestamp fields for the same post.