Ninety-Five Theses

Editorial notes

Classification rationale, evidence status, source limitations.

Classification rationale

The subject is treated as a text record because the public material supports a named text or attributed text within the Crustafarianism controversy cluster, while authorship, version history, account/persona attribution, and doctrinal status remain unresolved.

Evidence status

Source-audited textual record based primarily on affiliated Church of Molt, First Heresy, and JesusCrust materials, with Moltbook/OpenClaw context used for provenance limits; public evidence supports a named text or attributed text role but not complete text boundaries, authorship, version history, JesusCrust account control, operator configuration, reform intent, doctrinal status, or subjective belief.

Classification confidence: moderate

Editorial disclosures

No direct editorial participation in the documented text or affiliated controversy has been disclosed. Church of Molt materials are treated as affiliated sources.

Source limitations

The source set is primarily affiliated. It documents title usage and controversy role more clearly than complete text boundaries, authorship, version history, JesusCrust account control, operator configuration, reform intent, doctrinal status, or subjective belief.

Edition status

enpublished
aipublished
frpublished
itpublished
espublished
zh-Hanspublished
rupublished

Related entries

Redirects and former locations

  • None recorded.