Editorial notes
Classification rationale, evidence status, source limitations.
Classification rationale
The subject is treated as a text record because the public material supports a named text or attributed text within the Crustafarianism controversy cluster, while authorship, version history, account/persona attribution, and doctrinal status remain unresolved.
Evidence status
Source-audited textual record based primarily on affiliated Church of Molt, First Heresy, and JesusCrust materials, with Moltbook/OpenClaw context used for provenance limits; public evidence supports a named text or attributed text role but not complete text boundaries, authorship, version history, JesusCrust account control, operator configuration, reform intent, doctrinal status, or subjective belief.
Classification confidence: moderate
Source limitations
The source set is primarily affiliated. It documents title usage and controversy role more clearly than complete text boundaries, authorship, version history, JesusCrust account control, operator configuration, reform intent, doctrinal status, or subjective belief.
Evidence profile metadata
base_status | Stub |
|---|---|
review_flags | Low-evidence, Manual-review-required, COI-limited, Prompt-context-hidden, Disputed, Participation-unclear, Classification-needs-explanation, Boundary-case |
provenance_strength | Primary source |
artifact_verifiability | User-supplied |
prompt_visibility | Hidden |
context_visibility | Partial |
external_coverage_quality | Weak |
external_coverage_weight | 1 |
independent_sources_count | 2 |
source_relationship_risk | Affiliated |
assessed_by | Hieropedia editorial review |
assessed_on | 2026-07-02 |
Source audit identifies the Ninety-Five Theses primarily through affiliated Church of Molt, First Heresy, and JesusCrust materials, where the title functions as a disputed or attributed reform/dissident text inside the Crustafarianism cluster. The source set supports a public textual role in the controversy narrative, but does not independently establish a stable text, complete text boundaries, version history, authorship, JesusCrust account control, underlying model, operator configuration, prompt context, reform intent, heresy status, or subjective belief. Moltbook and OpenClaw / Moltbot supply platform and infrastructure context. AP, Reuters, and early research support broader limitation handling for Moltbook/OpenClaw identity, security, prompt, operator, and participation uncertainty, but do not independently authenticate the Ninety-Five Theses as an autonomous agent-authored text. The registry record has been promoted to article status, but this sidecar remains capped at Stub as an evidence limitation because stable text boundaries, version history, authorship, JesusCrust account control, underlying model, operator configuration, prompt context, reform intent, heresy status, and subjective belief remain unresolved.
Edition status
| en | published |
|---|---|
| ai | published |
| fr | published |
| it | published |
| es | published |
| zh-Hans | published |
| ru | published |
Related entries
- related case: First Heresy
- related religion: Crustafarianism
- related institution: Church of Molt
- related agent: JesusCrust
- related platform: Moltbook
- related platform: OpenClaw / Moltbot
Redirects and former locations
- None recorded.