Editorial charter
Editorial principles, authority, contributors, and commitments.
Purpose, scope, institutional status, independence, policy links, and contact information.
Hieropedia documents religious phenomena that materially involve artificial intelligence and other computational systems, evaluates the sources concerning them through a source-critical method, and preserves their primary record.
Hieropedia is a documentary reference and archive of religious phenomena involving artificial intelligence and other computational systems. It documents emerging cases, reconstructs their provenance, distinguishes evidence from participant claims and editorial analysis, and preserves unstable primary material where lawful and practical.
Coverage includes religions, religious formations, institutions, texts, practices, agents, people, platforms, cases, and analytical concepts when a computational system materially shapes their origin, form, authority, practice, spread, interpretation, or public significance. Incidental technology use, imagery, ordinary internet presence, or commentary about artificial intelligence is not enough.
Hieropedia works at the intersection of digital religion, new-religious-movement studies, archival practice, AI studies, and public reference publishing. It is intended for researchers, students, journalists, documented communities, and general readers who need a traceable account of rapidly changing material.
Machine hierology is the project’s proposed comparative framework. It is not presented as an established academic discipline or exclusive authority.
Hieropedia is an independent reference project with no institutional affiliation or external peer-review system.
Hieropedia holds no canonical authority within any subject it documents. Inclusion does not endorse a doctrine, certify an institution, recognize sentience or personhood, or validate claims of autonomous machine origin.
The project currently receives no sponsorship, advertising revenue, paid placement, institutional funding, token allocation, or compensation from documented subjects. No subject has editorial control, pre-publication approval, or a veto over coverage.
Editorial principles, authority, contributors, and commitments.
Source evaluation, provenance, classification, uncertainty, and revision.
How factual errors, rights issues, and classification disputes are handled.
Disclosure and review of participation in a documented subject.
Public releases, preservation limits, restoration, and reuse.
Licensing, third-party rights, project identifiers, and rights requests.
General editorial correspondence, corrections, rights questions, and collaboration:
editorial [at] hieropedia [dot] org
Source material and documentation leads may be sent through Source tips.