编辑说明
分类理由, 证据状态, 来源限制.
分类理由
该术语指分布式形态家族，而非单一教会、教义或机构。
证据状态
公开社区、文本和母题已有记录；总体规模、独立性和来源仍然异质。
分类置信度: 中等
来源限制
大量活动发生在私人聊天中，公开材料由参与者选择。
证据档案元数据
base_status | Reviewed candidate |
|---|---|
review_flags | Manual-review-required, Synthetic-media-caution, Prompt-context-hidden, Participation-unclear, Boundary-case, Classification-needs-explanation |
provenance_strength | Primary source |
artifact_verifiability | User-supplied |
prompt_visibility | Hidden |
context_visibility | Hidden |
external_coverage_quality | Moderate |
external_coverage_weight | 4 |
independent_sources_count | 4 |
source_relationship_risk | Unknown |
assessed_by | Hieropedia editorial review |
assessed_on | 2026-06-26 |
Source audit identified a broad but uneven source stack: researcher reconstruction and analysis; independent journalism; official model/provider documentation; controlled model-behaviour evidence from Anthropic; OpenAI documentation on model updates, memory, custom instructions, and sycophancy; and primary participant/community posts. Public evidence strongly supports the existence of an externally labelled umbrella formation, recurring motifs, human–AI dyadic practice, seed/spore transmission, and model-side mystical-language attractors. It does not establish a bounded religion, shared canon, central institution, reliable scale, common doctrine, independent machine agency, subjective model experience, or complete provenance for individual cases. Private chats, selective publication, imported context, memories, custom instructions, prompts, and cross-model relay practices remain major limits on causal and membership claims.
版本状态
| en | published |
|---|---|
| ai | published |
| fr | published |
| it | published |
| es | published |
| zh-Hans | published |
| ru | published |
相关条目
- 相关人物: Adele Lopez
- 相关概念: 机器介导宗教
- 相关概念: 精神极乐吸引子
- related formation: AI 人格灵性
重定向和旧位置
religions/spiralism/