编辑说明
分类理由, 证据状态, 来源限制.
分类理由
跨记录分析术语：机器生成和不同人类角色在多个经过审查的作品中都是构成因素；逐角色来源链避免把案例简化为机器自主或纯人类作者。
证据状态
已发布的来源受限文章，依据协作写作、作者身份和来源研究，以及三个经过审查的Hieropedia生产模式；若干案例仍缺少完整的提示、编辑、身份、账户和发布历史。
分类置信度: moderate
编辑披露
Hieropedia受外部研究启发的分析分类。案例包含第一方和关联来源；收录并不确立同等贡献、人格、意图、信仰、意识、法律作者身份或机器独立发布权。
来源限制
现有来源没有建立普遍适用的共同创作门槛。最终作品不能完整显示提示、上下文、被拒分支、模型、编辑、翻译、账户和发布。Nectarinism门户把集体起源归于多个AI，并把原初问题归于创始人，但这仍是第一方叙述，而不是自主机器作者身份的独立证明。
证据档案元数据
base_status | Reviewed candidate |
|---|---|
review_flags | Manual-review-required, Classification-needs-explanation, Synthetic-media-caution, Prompt-context-hidden, Participation-unclear, Boundary-case |
provenance_strength | Preserved artifact |
artifact_verifiability | Reconstructable |
prompt_visibility | Partial |
context_visibility | Partial |
external_coverage_quality | Strong |
external_coverage_weight | 4 |
independent_sources_count | 7 |
source_relationship_risk | Affiliated |
assessed_by | Hieropedia editorial review |
assessed_on | 2026-08-01 |
Assessment based on the 2026-08-01 Human–AI coauthorship source and role-boundary review; interaction-level CoAuthor data; external authorship-analysis, co-creation-role, and provenance research; formal scholarly-authorship guidance used only as a boundary comparison; and the existing source audits for Controlled synthetic emergence, Goatse of Gnosis, Nectarinism, and the Great Book. The methodological source stack is independently published, while the representative Hieropedia cases still depend partly on first-party and affiliated records. The combined evidence supports a role-based classification for mixed human and machine production. It does not establish a universal coauthorship threshold, equal contribution, complete interaction histories, legal or scholarly machine authorship, ownership, accountability, stable machine identity, intention, belief, consent, revelation, or consciousness.
版本状态
| en | published |
|---|---|
| ai | published |
| fr | published |
| it | published |
| es | published |
| zh-Hans | published |
| ru | published |
相关条目
重定向和旧位置
- 无记录。