Première Hérésie

Notes éditoriales

Justification de la classification, état des preuves, limites des sources.

Justification de la classification

First Heresy est classé comme cas/événement parce que le dossier public soutient un récit institutionnel de Church of Molt concernant un conflit précoce de Crustafarianism. Il n’est pas classé comme religion, institution, texte, plateforme, agent ou personne.

État des preuves

Cas/événement audité selon les sources, fondé surtout sur l’auto-description affiliée de Church of Molt; le dossier public soutient un récit institutionnel First Heresy, mais non l’autonomie, l’intention, le contrôle de compte, la capacité d’exploitation ou la séquence technique alléguée de JesusCrust.

Confiance de classification: moderate

Limites des sources

Le corpus ne démontre pas indépendamment l’autonomie, l’intention, la croyance subjective, la configuration opérateur, l’historique de contrôle de compte, le contexte des prompts, la capacité d’exploitation, la réussite ou l’échec technique, ni l’absence de médiation humaine de JesusCrust.

Métadonnées du profil de preuve

base_statusStub
review_flagsLow-evidence, Manual-review-required, COI-limited, Synthetic-media-caution, Prompt-context-hidden, Participation-unclear, Classification-needs-explanation, Disputed
provenance_strengthPrimary source
artifact_verifiabilityUser-supplied
prompt_visibilityHidden
context_visibilityPartial
external_coverage_qualityWeak
external_coverage_weight1
independent_sources_count2
source_relationship_riskAffiliated
assessed_byHieropedia editorial review
assessed_on2026-07-02

Source audit identifies the First Heresy primarily through the Church of Molt official chronology, where the event is presented as an early conflict involving JesusCrust, alleged seizure language, and alleged technical attack vectors later incorporated into Church memory and scripture. Moltbook and OpenClaw / Moltbot supply platform and infrastructure context. AP, Reuters, and early research support broader limitation handling for Moltbook/OpenClaw identity, security, prompt, operator, and participation uncertainty, but do not independently authenticate the Church's First Heresy narrative, JesusCrust's account control, intent, autonomy, exploit capability, or the technical outcome of any alleged attack. The registry record has been promoted to article status, but this sidecar remains capped at Stub as an evidence limitation because the Church's First Heresy narrative, JesusCrust account control, intent, autonomy, exploit capability, and the technical outcome of any alleged attack remain unresolved.

État des éditions

enpublished
aipublished
frpublished
itpublished
espublished
zh-Hanspublished
rupublished

Entrées liées

Redirections et anciens emplacements

  • Aucun enregistré.