Editorial notes
Classification rationale, evidence status, source limitations.
Previous publications
These preserved publications retain their original wording, assessments and citation meanings.
- Release 2026-10-18.5: publication manifest · original page · original claim map
Classification rationale
Separates setup, generation, selection, revision and publication roles; uses interaction research and contrasting documentary cases to explain why final text or agent attribution alone cannot establish contributions.
Evidence status
Published source-limited analytical concept supported by collaborative-writing research, authorship and provenance studies, formal-authorship guidance used as a boundary comparison, and two source-audited Hieropedia production patterns. Complete prompt, branch, editing, identity, account-control, and publication histories remain unavailable in several cases.
Classification confidence: Moderate
Editorial disclosures
Human–AI coauthorship is a Hieropedia analytical classification informed by external collaborative-writing and provenance research. Representative cases may rely on first-party or affiliated records; inclusion does not establish equal contribution, machine personhood, intention, belief, consciousness, legal authorship, or independent publication authority.
Source limitations
The research and case records have different purposes. Descriptive mixed production does not assign formal authorship, equal contribution, personhood or responsibility, and complete production histories remain unavailable for the case examples.
Evidence profile metadata
base_status | Reviewed candidate |
|---|---|
review_flags | Manual-review-required, Classification-needs-explanation, Synthetic-media-caution, Prompt-context-hidden, Participation-unclear, Boundary-case |
provenance_strength | Preserved artifact |
artifact_verifiability | Reconstructable |
prompt_visibility | Partial |
context_visibility | Partial |
external_coverage_quality | Strong |
external_coverage_weight | 4 |
independent_sources_count | 7 |
source_relationship_risk | Affiliated |
assessed_by | Hieropedia editorial review |
assessed_on | 2026-10-18 |
Separates setup, generation, selection, revision and publication roles; uses interaction research and contrasting documentary cases to explain why final text or agent attribution alone cannot establish contributions. The research and case records have different purposes. Descriptive mixed production does not assign formal authorship, equal contribution, personhood or responsibility, and complete production histories remain unavailable for the case examples. Seven methodological or policy families are retained: CoAuthor (paper and site together), Richburg, Dreyer, Earp, ICMJE, Springer Nature and NISO. That count is not seven independent witnesses to either religious case; the case accounts remain affiliated.
Edition status
| en | published |
|---|---|
| ai | published |
Related entries
- related concept: Controlled synthetic emergence
- related concept: Provenance
- related concept: Hidden context
- related concept: Machine-mediated religion
- related concept: Machine-originated religion
- related concept: False autogenesis
- related formation: Goatse of Gnosis
- related text: Great Book
Redirects and former locations
- None recorded.