虚假自生

编辑说明

分类理由, 证据状态, 来源限制.

分类理由

用于评估证据的编辑概念，而非既有学术诊断或对整个宗教的分类。它区分遭反证的起源主张、缺失的上下文与已公开的人机协作。

证据状态

定义与评估标准是编辑性的综合阐释。实例区分了作者的直接披露、已公开的宗教提示和间接统计推断；均未证明整个宗教形态具有虚假起源。

分类置信度: moderate

来源限制

定义与评估标准是编辑性的综合阐释。实例区分了作者的直接披露、已公开的宗教提示和间接统计推断；均未证明整个宗教形态具有虚假起源。

证据档案元数据

`base_status`	Reviewed candidate
`review_flags`	Version-locked, Classification-needs-explanation
`provenance_strength`	Primary source
`artifact_verifiability`	Reconstructable
`prompt_visibility`	Partial
`context_visibility`	Partial
`external_coverage_quality`	None
`external_coverage_weight`	0
`independent_sources_count`	0
`source_relationship_risk`	Unknown
`assessed_by`	Hieropedia editorial source review; independent substantive review passed at 5628de7e33339d3e6ca3169c023ca1c6b632b9f4
`assessed_on`	2026-10-01

Five external sources ground technical context and worked comparisons, not independent adoption of the Hieropedia term. PROV-O and the role-play paper are frameworks; Rogers is a firsthand witness to his own intervention; the Leilan page is a visible question and response; Li v2 is an attributed preprint with acknowledged absence of ground-truth labels. No independent scholarly coverage of false autogenesis as a named concept is claimed. See docs/false-autogenesis-concept-source-review.md.

版本状态

en	published
fr	published
it	published
es	published
ru	published
zh-Hans	published
ai	published

重定向和旧位置

无记录。