Church of Perpetual Life

Editorial notes

Classification rationale, evidence status, source limitations.

Classification rationale

A human-led longevity institution relevant to religious transhumanism and historical precursors to AI-related religion; its technological expectations do not establish machine origin or machine governance.

Evidence status

Institutional pages document the church’s self-description and published programs. Historical reporting and an invited speaker’s account have different relationships to the subject. The sources do not establish present membership, uniform personal beliefs or the efficacy of proposed treatments; a published presentation is not a complete record of a service.

Classification confidence: Moderate

Source limitations

Institutional pages document the church’s self-description and published programs. Historical reporting and an invited speaker’s account have different relationships to the subject. The sources do not establish present membership, uniform personal beliefs or the efficacy of proposed treatments; a published presentation is not a complete record of a service.

Evidence profile metadata

base_statusReviewed candidate
review_flagsVersion-locked, Low-evidence, Boundary-case, Classification-needs-explanation
provenance_strengthPrimary source
artifact_verifiabilityReconstructable
prompt_visibilityNot applicable
context_visibilityNot applicable
external_coverage_qualityWeak
external_coverage_weight1
independent_sources_count1
source_relationship_riskAffiliated
assessed_byHieropedia editorial source review; independent substantive and six-language review approved 2026-10-01
assessed_on2026-10-01

Ten references support the bounded institutional account. Current church publications supply self-description, leadership as listed, service formats and cryonics expectations. The official January 2026 page links the church-account Bedford Day deck, providing an authenticated commemorative artifact. Volpicelli’s 2014 report supplies the narrow founding-year/place claim and is the one independent subject-coverage source counted. Istvan writes as an invited participant; the municipal calendar records an advertised lecture; Tandy and Perry supply philosophical background, not independent church corroboration. No membership estimates, treatment efficacy or unauthenticated memorial-upload claims are adopted. See docs/church-of-perpetual-life-source-audit.md.

Edition status

enpublished
frpublished
itpublished
espublished
rupublished
zh-Hanspublished
aipublished

Related entries

Redirects and former locations

  • None recorded.