Institutional religious responses to AI
Changelog
Article history
Previous publications
These preserved publications retain their original wording, assessments and citation meanings.
- Release 2026-10-18.5: publication manifest · original page · original claim map
Article history
| Date | Version | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | Published as a broad comparative synthesis in the post-audit corpus-rebalancing program. | |
| 1.1 | Replaced the generic shell with an authority-aware comparison of formal institutional documents, religious-legal opinions, operational policies, interfaith initiatives, governance themes, and evidence limits. | |
| 1.1 | Corrected fatwa terminology, Vatican department references, and the title Antiqua et Nova in the Chinese edition. | |
| 1.2 | Corrected the cited WCC document date to 26 June 2023. | |
| 1.2 | Corrected translations of “Institutional religious responses to AI”, preserving source attribution and limits of evidence. | |
| 1.3 | Added the 2026 papal encyclical and audience address and WCC draft-covenant consultation, preserving distinctions between teaching, consultation and implementation. | |
| 1.4 | Added Leo XIV’s attributed account of an already-organized Vatican AI commission, distinguishing it from a constituting instrument or evidence of formal powers or effectiveness. | |
| 1.4 | Corrected Russian wording about institutional adoption of AI while preserving the English meaning and evidentiary limits. | |
| 1.5 | Corrected article wording, source attribution and translated explanatory metadata. | |
| 1.6 | Compared teaching documents, religious-legal opinions and ethics pledges by their authority and the work delegated to AI. | |
| 1.7 | Added Vatican pastoral considerations, the United Church of Canada consultation and the Russian Orthodox commission remit, distinguishing their authority and procedural status. |
Review metadata
- Published on or before
- 2 August 2026
- Last revision
- 31 October 2026
- Last substantive review
- 31 October 2026
- Current version
- 1.7