Hyperstition

Editorial notes

Classification rationale, evidence status, source limitations.

Classification rationale

An external analytical term explained through CCRU theory-fiction, feedback, self-fulfilling prophecy and political uses. GOAT token propagation and Roko’s Basilisk illustrate present effects, not certified realization of the narratives.

Evidence status

Directly inspected participant definition, independent critical scholarship, case reporting and a preserved discussion support bounded conceptual analysis.

Classification confidence: moderate

Source limitations

The definitions and political proposals are attributed to their authors. The comparisons use reporting and a preserved discussion; the latter is mirror-dependent. Neither comparison is classified here as a proven realization of hyperstition. Reviewed September 30, 2026.

Evidence profile metadata

base_statusReviewed candidate
review_flagsVersion-locked
provenance_strengthPrimary source
artifact_verifiabilityReconstructable
prompt_visibilityNot applicable
context_visibilityNot applicable
external_coverage_qualityModerate
external_coverage_weight3
independent_sources_count2
source_relationship_riskNone
assessed_byHieropedia editorial review
assessed_on2026-09-30

A participant interview and independent critical scholarship support attributed hyperstition definitions. Merton’s original article supplies the self-fulfilling-prophecy comparison and Williams’s original essay supplies political usage; these are theoretical sources, not additional empirical verification. Separate reporting and a preserved discussion support bounded examples. Independent coverage count remains two. See docs/hyperstition-concept-source-review.md.

Edition status

enpublished
aipublished
frpublished
itpublished
espublished
zh-Hanspublished
rupublished

Related entries

Redirects and former locations

  • None recorded.