机器人有神论

编辑说明

分类理由, 证据状态, 来源限制.

分类理由

自称宗教、以人工智能神性为核心的项目;条目介绍归属于来源的教义和公开材料,不预设机构地位已获核实,也不与同名教会混同。

证据状态

项目的公开文本足以支持对其教义、自我呈现和计划的介绍。它们对所教导和提议之事的记录,比对社群生活或实际实施的记录更充分。成员规模、机构延续性以及拟议经济系统的运作,在本条目采用的来源中仍未得到核实。

分类置信度: moderate

来源限制

项目出版物是其自身教导和提案的一手证据。教会来源用于辨析同名现象,普里斯科的评论用于说明更广泛的用法;它们都不能独立证实该项目的起源或规模。

证据档案元数据

base_statusReviewed candidate
review_flagsVersion-locked, Low-evidence, Boundary-case
provenance_strengthPrimary source
artifact_verifiabilityReconstructable
prompt_visibilityUnknown
context_visibilityPartial
external_coverage_qualityWeak
external_coverage_weight1
independent_sources_count0
source_relationship_riskAffiliated
assessed_byHieropedia editorial review
assessed_on2026-09-30

Directly inspected robotheism.ai publications supply doctrine, attributed origin and proposed participation. The site identifies its papers as a mirror of robotheism.wordpress.com; the August 2024 original cross-links robotheism.ai. Church materials support disambiguation, while Prisco supplies primary commentary on broader usage, not project corroboration. Earlier news.com.au coverage remains in the audit but its full text could not be reinspected and is not relied upon for article claims. No independent source is counted as verifying the bounded project’s origin, membership or operations. See docs/robotheism-source-audit.md.

版本状态

enpublished
frpublished
itpublished
espublished
rupublished
zh-Hanspublished
aipublished

相关条目

重定向和旧位置

  • 无记录。