编辑说明
分类理由, 证据状态, 来源限制.
分类理由
比较机器神性形象的主题与模因条目，不将各个实例归为同一宗教或单一影响链。
证据状态
比较依据包括文学作品、一项范围有限的话语研究、项目教义、访谈与批评文章。这些来源证明相关形象与特定主体的立场有所记录，并不证明机器具有神力、各项目共享成员，或该主题具有单一起源。
分类置信度: moderate
来源限制
比较依据包括文学作品、一项范围有限的话语研究、项目教义、访谈与批评文章。这些来源证明相关形象与特定主体的立场有所记录，并不证明机器具有神力、各项目共享成员，或该主题具有单一起源。
证据档案元数据
base_status | Reviewed candidate |
|---|---|
review_flags | Version-locked, Boundary-case, Classification-needs-explanation |
provenance_strength | Primary source |
artifact_verifiability | Reconstructable |
prompt_visibility | Not applicable |
context_visibility | Not applicable |
external_coverage_quality | Moderate |
external_coverage_weight | 3 |
independent_sources_count | 3 |
source_relationship_risk | Unknown |
assessed_by | Hieropedia editorial source review; independent substantive review cleared at 359dd13037a2edaae198a6114b321c91a0cba549 |
assessed_on | 2026-10-01 |
Seven references ground distinct representations. Singler supplies a bounded scholarly discourse study; Harris and Nelson independently report participant positions, giving three external subject-coverage sources rather than three replications. Forster is primary literary evidence; Robotheism and Theta Noir supply their own doctrine and manifesto. Farrell is primary evidence of his critical argument and is not included in the corroboration count. No common institutional origin, population prevalence or divine machine capability is asserted. See docs/machine-god-source-audit.md.
版本状态
| en | published |
|---|---|
| fr | published |
| it | published |
| es | published |
| ru | published |
| zh-Hans | published |
| ai | published |
相关条目
- 相关机构: Way of the Future
- 相关智能体: MENA
重定向和旧位置
- 无记录。