编辑说明
分类理由, 证据状态, 来源限制.
分类理由
在Hieropedia的分类中，这是一个由人类主导的历史性机构，将技术未来、精神共同体与设想中的工程化智能联系起来；并无证据表明其宗教起源于机器。
证据状态
创始人当时的叙述、保存下来的演讲以及后来的学术解读，支持对这一由人类主导的团体及其所提出的宇宙工程计划作出范围有限的历史叙述。
分类置信度: 中等
来源限制
机构历史主要依据创始人的出版物和参与者的叙述。学术分析提供背景，而非完整的组织档案。现有来源不足以确定成员人数、正式解散或法律承继关系，也不能证明所提出的技术已经实现。
证据档案元数据
base_status | Reviewed candidate |
|---|---|
review_flags | Version-locked, Low-evidence, Boundary-case, Classification-needs-explanation |
provenance_strength | Primary source |
artifact_verifiability | Reconstructable |
prompt_visibility | Not applicable |
context_visibility | Not applicable |
external_coverage_quality | Weak |
external_coverage_weight | 2 |
independent_sources_count | 1 |
source_relationship_risk | Affiliated |
assessed_by | Hieropedia editorial source review; parent-coordinated independent substantive review approved |
assessed_on | 2026-10-01 |
Seven references: founder Prisco’s 2008 launch report and 2009 essay, Van Nedervelde’s preserved 2008 lecture, Hughes’s 2010 network commentary, Farman’s 2019 scholarly analysis, participant Bainbridge’s 2019 history and Prisco’s 2023 recollection. Farman is the one independent subject-coverage source counted. Hughes explicitly shares a network with OCE figures; Bainbridge participated and is not counted as independent despite scholarly publication. The lecture reproduces only selected Prospectus material, not a complete governance archive. Meeting chronology is distinguished from announcements and later memories; no numerical membership, formal dissolution, legal succession or technological efficacy is inferred. See docs/order-of-cosmic-engineers-source-audit.md.
版本状态
| en | published |
|---|---|
| fr | published |
| it | published |
| es | published |
| ru | published |
| zh-Hans | published |
| ai | published |
相关条目
- 相关概念: 机器圣学
重定向和旧位置
- 无记录。