编辑说明
分类理由, 证据状态, 来源限制.
分类理由
该记录被归类为概念，因为它按具身宗教功能汇集多个跨传统部署和演示，而不是记录单一机构、机器人、宗教或事件。该标签描述被执行或呈现的角色，并不主张授职、获承认的神职职位、圣礼有效性或自主宗教权威。
证据状态
该总括性概念已完成来源审计；代表性部署和演示已有文献记录，但正式神职身份、授职、仪式权威、自主性和长期采用仍未解决。
分类置信度: moderate
编辑披露
未披露对所记录项目的直接编辑参与。
来源限制
来源记录了部分机构部署、原型和公开演示，但不能证明正式神职身份、持续采用、普遍接受、自主教义或仪式判断、机器信仰或意识，也不能证明其等同于人类宗教权威。技术能力与宗教地位因案例而异，必须分别评估。
证据档案元数据
base_status | Reviewed candidate |
|---|---|
review_flags | Classification-needs-explanation, Boundary-case |
provenance_strength | Primary source |
artifact_verifiability | Platform-verified |
prompt_visibility | Partial |
context_visibility | Partial |
external_coverage_quality | Strong |
external_coverage_weight | 4 |
independent_sources_count | 6 |
source_relationship_risk | None |
assessed_by | Hieropedia editorial review |
assessed_on | 2026-07-20 |
Assessment based on the 2026-07-14 robotic clergy and automated religious officiants source audit and the 2026-07-20 article publication. Kōdai-ji primary material establishes Mindar as a continuing temple-deployed android used for a scheduled Heart Sutra sermon and sacred representational framing. Independent reporting and technical coverage document Xian’er, BlessU-2, SanTO, and Pepper funeral demonstrations as bounded comparisons, while academic work addresses credibility, embodiment, affect, institutional labor, and religious authority. The published article separates robot body, control system, human-authored content, institutional authorization, performed role, and audience reception, and does not establish ordination, sacramental validity, autonomous doctrine or ritual judgment, machine belief or consciousness, universal acceptance, or equivalence to human clergy.
版本状态
| en | published |
|---|---|
| ai | published |
| fr | published |
| it | published |
| es | published |
| zh-Hans | published |
| ru | published |
相关条目
重定向和旧位置
- 无记录。