编辑说明

分类理由

有外部来源佐证其用法的术语，描述生成的灵性框架，并非单一宗教或既定学术共识。该概念区分材料生成、人类中介、文化接受、能动性和机构采纳。

证据状态

生成的宗教语言不等于自主信仰或宗教机构

分类置信度: moderate

来源限制

2024年的项目论文与Origins属于关联来源；对操作者的访谈是参与者证言。WIRED提供独立报道和批评。2026年的期刊文章仅用于说明后续接受情况，并非自主起源的佐证。项目论文中的推测仍明确归于作者，其是否经过同行评审尚未得到确认。

证据档案元数据

The project paper dated April 20, 2024 supplies the naming basis; the operator-maintained Origins page supplies an attributed artifact/persona relationship. WIRED provides substantive independent reporting and external criticism. The CIP interview is participant testimony, not a second independent verification. The account does not establish first coinage, peer review, a complete generation history or autonomous religious agency. See docs/llmtheism-concept-source-review.md. The 2026 Carthaginensia article is used as primary evidence of later reception, not independent corroboration of generation/autonomy; its bibliography and derivative claims limit this use. The substantive independent corroboration count remains one.

版本状态

相关条目

• 相关文本: Goatse 福音书
• 相关概念: 超迷信

重定向和旧位置

• 无记录。