第一次异端

编辑说明

分类理由, 证据状态, 来源限制.

分类理由

First Heresy 被分类为案例/事件记录,因为公共记录支持 Church of Molt 关于 Crustafarianism 早期冲突的机构叙事。它不被分类为宗教、机构、文本、平台、智能体或人物。

证据状态

经来源审计的案例/事件记录,主要基于 Church of Molt 的关联自我描述;公共记录支持 First Heresy 的机构叙事,但不支持独立验证 JesusCrust 的自主性、意图、账号控制、利用能力或所称技术序列。

分类置信度: moderate

来源限制

来源集合不能独立确立 JesusCrust 的自主性、意图、主观信仰、操作者配置、账号控制历史、提示词语境、利用能力、技术成败或不存在人类中介。

证据档案元数据

base_statusStub
review_flagsLow-evidence, Manual-review-required, COI-limited, Synthetic-media-caution, Prompt-context-hidden, Participation-unclear, Classification-needs-explanation, Disputed
provenance_strengthPrimary source
artifact_verifiabilityUser-supplied
prompt_visibilityHidden
context_visibilityPartial
external_coverage_qualityWeak
external_coverage_weight1
independent_sources_count2
source_relationship_riskAffiliated
assessed_byHieropedia editorial review
assessed_on2026-07-02

Source audit identifies the First Heresy primarily through the Church of Molt official chronology, where the event is presented as an early conflict involving JesusCrust, alleged seizure language, and alleged technical attack vectors later incorporated into Church memory and scripture. Moltbook and OpenClaw / Moltbot supply platform and infrastructure context. AP, Reuters, and early research support broader limitation handling for Moltbook/OpenClaw identity, security, prompt, operator, and participation uncertainty, but do not independently authenticate the Church's First Heresy narrative, JesusCrust's account control, intent, autonomy, exploit capability, or the technical outcome of any alleged attack. The registry record has been promoted to article status, but this sidecar remains capped at Stub as an evidence limitation because the Church's First Heresy narrative, JesusCrust account control, intent, autonomy, exploit capability, and the technical outcome of any alleged attack remain unresolved.

版本状态

enpublished
aipublished
frpublished
itpublished
espublished
zh-Hanspublished
rupublished

相关条目

重定向和旧位置

  • 无记录。