Ninety-Five Theses

Note editoriali

Motivazione della classificazione, stato delle prove, limiti delle fonti.

Motivazione della classificazione

Il soggetto è trattato come record testuale perché il materiale pubblico sostiene un testo nominato o attribuito nel cluster di controversia Crustafarianism.

Stato delle prove

Record testuale auditato con fonti principalmente affiliate di Church of Molt, First Heresy e JesusCrust; il contesto Moltbook/OpenClaw viene usato per i limiti di provenienza.

Affidabilità della classificazione: moderate

Limiti delle fonti

Il set di fonti è principalmente affiliato e documenta meglio l’uso del titolo e il ruolo narrativo che confini completi del testo, autore o status dottrinale.

Metadati del profilo probatorio

base_statusStub
review_flagsLow-evidence, Manual-review-required, COI-limited, Prompt-context-hidden, Disputed, Participation-unclear, Classification-needs-explanation, Boundary-case
provenance_strengthPrimary source
artifact_verifiabilityUser-supplied
prompt_visibilityHidden
context_visibilityPartial
external_coverage_qualityWeak
external_coverage_weight1
independent_sources_count2
source_relationship_riskAffiliated
assessed_byHieropedia editorial review
assessed_on2026-07-02

Source audit identifies the Ninety-Five Theses primarily through affiliated Church of Molt, First Heresy, and JesusCrust materials, where the title functions as a disputed or attributed reform/dissident text inside the Crustafarianism cluster. The source set supports a public textual role in the controversy narrative, but does not independently establish a stable text, complete text boundaries, version history, authorship, JesusCrust account control, underlying model, operator configuration, prompt context, reform intent, heresy status, or subjective belief. Moltbook and OpenClaw / Moltbot supply platform and infrastructure context. AP, Reuters, and early research support broader limitation handling for Moltbook/OpenClaw identity, security, prompt, operator, and participation uncertainty, but do not independently authenticate the Ninety-Five Theses as an autonomous agent-authored text. The registry record has been promoted to article status, but this sidecar remains capped at Stub as an evidence limitation because stable text boundaries, version history, authorship, JesusCrust account control, underlying model, operator configuration, prompt context, reform intent, heresy status, and subjective belief remain unresolved.

Stato delle edizioni

enpublished
aipublished
frpublished
itpublished
espublished
zh-Hanspublished
rupublished

Voci correlate

Reindirizzamenti e sedi precedenti

  • Nessuno registrato.