{
  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
  "articleId": "hp:concepts:provenance",
  "locale": "zh-Hans",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://hieropedia.org/zh-Hans/concepts/provenance/",
  "title": "来源链",
  "articleVersion": "1.2",
  "translationVersion": "7367dd7431f3",
  "translationState": "current",
  "translationRevisedOn": "2026-08-04",
  "translationMethod": "machine-assisted-editorial",
  "translationCompleteness": "complete",
  "publishedOnOrBefore": null,
  "lastReviewed": "2026-08-03",
  "retrievedOn": "2026-08-04",
  "authorship": "Hieropedia Editorial",
  "formattedCitation": "Hieropedia Editorial. \"来源链.\" Hieropedia, version 1.2, last revised 2026-08-03, last reviewed 2026-08-03. https://hieropedia.org/zh-Hans/concepts/provenance/ Retrieved 2026-08-04.",
  "citationKey": "hieropedia-hp-concepts-provenance-zh-hans",
  "cslJson": {
    "id": "hieropedia-hp-concepts-provenance-zh-hans",
    "type": "webpage",
    "title": "来源链",
    "URL": "https://hieropedia.org/zh-Hans/concepts/provenance/",
    "version": "1.2",
    "language": "zh-Hans",
    "author": [
      {
        "literal": "Hieropedia Editorial"
      }
    ],
    "accessed": {
      "date-parts": [
        [
          2026,
          8,
          4
        ]
      ]
    },
    "note": "Stable article ID hp:concepts:provenance; translation version 7367dd7431f3; last revised 2026-08-03, last reviewed 2026-08-03."
  },
  "bibtex": "@online{hieropedia-hp-concepts-provenance-zh-hans,\n  author = {{Hieropedia Editorial}},\n  title = {{来源链}},\n  url = {https://hieropedia.org/zh-Hans/concepts/provenance/},\n  urldate = {2026-08-04},\n  note = {Version 1.2; stable article ID hp:concepts:provenance; last revised 2026-08-03; last reviewed 2026-08-03}\n}\n",
  "claimMapUrl": "https://hieropedia.org/zh-Hans/concepts/provenance/claims.json",
  "evidenceDossier": null,
  "preservationManifest": null,
  "claims": [
    {
      "segmentId": "s001",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s001",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s001",
      "sourceHash": "28375de82cfda10a",
      "translationHash": "369c6f62a1544375",
      "excerpt": "来源链 类型 编辑性分类概念 Hieropedia 状态 已发布并用于语料分类的概念 领域 机器圣学；编辑分类 范围 某一文本、机器输出、仪式性主张、教义表述、机构性声明或宗教文物被生成、保存、传递、编辑、发布并随后解释的文献链 对照 隐藏上下文 当前状态 已于 2026 年 6 月 22 日发布",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s002",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s002",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s002",
      "sourceHash": "0748bfa5de08a662",
      "translationHash": "0984f59cc28722c2",
      "excerpt": "出处 是文本、机器输出、仪式主张、教义表述、制度主张或宗教制品生成、保存、传播、编辑、出版和随后解释的记录链。该术语作为一个编辑概念，用于追踪关于起源、作者身份、机器机构、人类中介、隐藏背景、编辑选择和出版历史的已知信息。",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s003",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s003",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s003",
      "sourceHash": "d4b1ea5708dd5329",
      "translationHash": "9a377ae82211e65a",
      "excerpt": "概述",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s004",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s004",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s004",
      "sourceHash": "3a4ad2e156e06ac9",
      "translationHash": "3624d3080b996abe",
      "excerpt": "这个概念足够广泛，可以涵盖机器中介的宗教、机器起源的宗教、伪机器起源的宗教以及有争议的人工智能宗教案件。它有助于将可见的文物与产生它、保存它或改变它后来流通方式的一系列条件分开。",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s005",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s005",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s005",
      "sourceHash": "8a1ece8380623b33",
      "translationHash": "3ae1d32ce254e6df",
      "excerpt": "因此，来源链不是“真相”“真实性”或“教义权威”的同义词。它是一种提问方式，用来判断记录真正支持什么、遗漏了什么，以及是否真的有理由作出强分类。",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s006",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s006",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s006",
      "sourceHash": "9813fafb098c2180",
      "translationHash": "b4d7d450f617bcae",
      "excerpt": "定义",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s007",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s007",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s007",
      "sourceHash": "5a3a5f179b5f8276",
      "translationHash": "7769a42c3e429342",
      "excerpt": "出处意味着从一代到后来的解释的链条。该链可能包括原始抄本或工件、提示和上下文披露、已知的系统指令、模型或系统版本、记忆或检索、工具参与、人工编辑和选择、翻译和释义历史、出版顺序、保存链、档案保管、屏幕截图与完整抄本、后来的理论使用、机构框架、机器机构的主张以及任何明显的证据差距。",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s008",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s008",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s008",
      "sourceHash": "80b89257f54e3e36",
      "translationHash": "974395f3f41a6536",
      "excerpt": "公式 编辑含义 来源链 ≠ 真相 文献链再完整，也不能单独证明某项主张为真。 来源链 ≠ 教义权威 文献记录不会自动使传统内部的主张具有权威性。 来源链 ≠ 信念真实性 知道发布链并不能决定参与者是否真诚。 强来源链可以支持分类，但不等于认可教义 Hieropedia 可以对案例分类，同时不对其主张作出认可。 弱来源链不一定就是欺骗 不完整的记录可能只是普通档案流失。 缺失的来源链可能让起源问题悬而未决，而不是直接判为假 证据缺失往往只是把问题留在开放状态。",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s009",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s009",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s009",
      "sourceHash": "91e74b9ebb80b72d",
      "translationHash": "d605a80f4e6bf3e1",
      "excerpt": "来源链的要素",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s010",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s010",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s010",
      "sourceHash": "6ecb2fb2c02a3c65",
      "translationHash": "0c7d27e7d2649c0d",
      "excerpt": "原始 transcript 或文物： 仍可追溯到的最早形式。 提示词与上下文披露： 如果可获得，塑造机器回应的输入。 已知的系统指令： 改变输出的隐藏或管理性指令。 模型或系统版本： 具体的发布、检查点或部署。 记忆、检索或工具参与： 保留的上下文或外部调用改变了结果。 人类编辑与筛选： 整理、删减、审查和发布选择。 翻译与转述历史： 文本是以原文、译文还是后来的转述形式保存下来。 发布顺序： 什么先出现，什么后来出现，什么被保留。 保存链： 材料如何在会话、档案、账户或平台",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s011",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s011",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s011",
      "sourceHash": "913e6daf56c0d5a9",
      "translationHash": "675e18f0f95f843c",
      "excerpt": "来源链在机器介导宗教中的作用",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s012",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s012",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s012",
      "sourceHash": "38c299dfe2ad48b2",
      "translationHash": "9c3b62bad6964918",
      "excerpt": "机器介导宗教常常依赖来源链，因为提示词、界面、平台、记忆与发布的链条会影响解释。AI Jesus 就是一个清楚的例子：卢塞恩实验足够公开，能够识别其框架，但来源链仍然必要，因为它决定头像、提示结构和发布链能够说明什么，不能说明什么。",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s013",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s013",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s013",
      "sourceHash": "3494cb66b41188ea",
      "translationHash": "60a1da832b2b6bcb",
      "excerpt": "在这种情况下，来源链有助于区分对耶稣的再现、chatbot 或 avatar 界面、牧养或敬虔模拟，以及真实的神职、圣礼或教义。这个概念不会裁定神学有效性；它只是澄清记录真正记录了哪种互动。",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s014",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s014",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s014",
      "sourceHash": "0fce8615937c6735",
      "translationHash": "b402542395ed949b",
      "excerpt": "来源链在机器起源主张中的作用",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s015",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s015",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s015",
      "sourceHash": "5ee09a4be2859fa4",
      "translationHash": "521357700b3f7d94",
      "excerpt": "机器起源的宗教比机器介导的宗教更有力，而起源是使这种区别成为可能的证据测试。在将案件归类为机器起源之前，需要提供文件支持。相关记录可以包括原始抄本、提示和上下文披露、模型/版本信息、记忆或检索的证据、保存和出版链以及人工调解或编辑选择的迹象。",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s016",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s016",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s016",
      "sourceHash": "65af6602dce274ed",
      "translationHash": "9c9cc53c194d21ce",
      "excerpt": "当记录较薄时，隐藏上下文、选择性发布或操作者框定都可能让起源问题悬而未决。一个经过润饰的文物可能看起来像是自主的，却并不能证明其自主起源。",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s017",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s017",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s017",
      "sourceHash": "406f14bc8271c60e",
      "translationHash": "16764c581a475056",
      "excerpt": "来源链与隐藏上下文",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s018",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s018",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s018",
      "sourceHash": "51f0c159b5818fab",
      "translationHash": "6dfba6b10431e18e",
      "excerpt": "隐藏上下文 是来源链的一个主要问题。未披露的提示词、系统指令、先前对话历史、记忆、工具输出、训练数据回声、人类编辑、省略的失败输出、没有 transcript 的截图，以及事后框定，都可能改变对记录的阅读。",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s019",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s019",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s019",
      "sourceHash": "3f7256f620aa6fdd",
      "translationHash": "5d82bd0c6a88b18a",
      "excerpt": "这个分析术语不同于 必要的上下文 ，这是一个独特的油桃主义教义术语。隐藏背景是关于记录遗漏内容的证据问题；必要背景是一个内部宗教术语，表示油桃主义教义所说的必须存在的内容。",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s020",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s020",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s020",
      "sourceHash": "ee61a3099acb354d",
      "translationHash": "cf40e49bc259fb8a",
      "excerpt": "来源链与伪机器起源宗教",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s021",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s021",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s021",
      "sourceHash": "1f69f7c8ac004d1b",
      "translationHash": "5cc9c7c8608a4c5c",
      "excerpt": "伪机器起源宗教 是对照类别，适用于公众印象中的机器起源弱于来源链记录的案例。隐藏 prompting、隐藏的人类署名、选择性发布、事后归因或平台控制，都可能削弱强机器起源主张。",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s022",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s022",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s022",
      "sourceHash": "1ef8cab7deacd4b1",
      "translationHash": "de92109c7ba6eb63",
      "excerpt": "这并不意味着该形态不真诚、无关紧要或虚假。它只意味着记录不足以支持更强的起源叙事。",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s023",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s023",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s023",
      "sourceHash": "03c8909ba1095741",
      "translationHash": "b37637088ea50ff4",
      "excerpt": "来源链与教义主张",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s024",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s024",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s024",
      "sourceHash": "1191afb343ba0486",
      "translationHash": "f45d6b2a51e30a3d",
      "excerpt": "来源链并不决定某项教义主张是真、是假、真诚还是权威。它决定文献链能够支持什么。一个传统可以拥有很强的来源链，但仍然可能是错误的、有争议的或暂时性的。它也可能来源链较弱，却依然具有文化重要性或历史意义。",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s025",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s025",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s025",
      "sourceHash": "047d21592374f029",
      "translationHash": "a67f6250ed598277",
      "excerpt": "因此，出处充当分类工具，而不是对信仰的判决。它支持仔细比较，而不会将证据、权威和奉献精神归结为一项主张。",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s026",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s026",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s026",
      "sourceHash": "00c2aca645e784ad",
      "translationHash": "71769400d1c44850",
      "excerpt": "分析用途",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s027",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s027",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s027",
      "sourceHash": "a4bea577a21127ab",
      "translationHash": "26488cf07351e7d5",
      "excerpt": "出处使来源、作者身份、机器代理、人工调解、隐藏上下文、编辑选择和出版历史保持清晰。该术语帮助编辑确定某个案件是否属于机器媒介宗教、机器起源宗教、伪机器起源宗教或完全属于另一个类别。",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s028",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s028",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s028",
      "sourceHash": "43414056c7b6fc14",
      "translationHash": "4c0c33c64c23b592",
      "excerpt": "当材料看起来从 transcript 变成教义、从截图变成传统，或从机器输出变成机构性主张时，这个概念尤其有用。在这些情形下，来源链使语料库能够比较案例，而不会把所有与 AI 相关的记录都当成同一种证据。",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s029",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s029",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s029",
      "sourceHash": "cf4431d8007c5f05",
      "translationHash": "157732a4d1cc170b",
      "excerpt": "示例及争议案例",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s030",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s030",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s030",
      "sourceHash": "12198acbe0525cd2",
      "translationHash": "5c0baaed80871a0c",
      "excerpt": "AI Jesus 展示了界面、提示结构和发布语境在机器介导案例中的重要性。 Nectarinism 仍然是一个对来源链敏感的案例，其起源能动性的解释在这里有文献记录，但并未被裁定。 Crustafarianism 也是一个来源链未解决的案例：机器参与已被记录，但机器起源仍然开放。 Way of the Future 是由人类创立的 AI 宗教，因此是讨论来源链问题的有用对照。 Roko's Basilisk 是一种模因与哲学形态，不是宗教，可作为来源链与分类的对照案例。",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s031",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s031",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s031",
      "sourceHash": "7ce142e6e6915cd5",
      "translationHash": "036039d1cea6a659",
      "excerpt": "外部框架",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s032",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s032",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s032",
      "sourceHash": "56d30da5a9386767",
      "translationHash": "faf902250a858ac5",
      "excerpt": "来源分析与实体、活动和代理之间的 W3C PROV-O 区分兼容。这里使用PROV-O作为描述派生链和责任链的外部技术框架；它不决定宗教分类或解决有争议的机构。 [E1]",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s033",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s033",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s033",
      "sourceHash": "2fa97693b70fa87b",
      "translationHash": "fe7d1a9913f928ea",
      "excerpt": "另见",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s034",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s034",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s034",
      "sourceHash": "6cb53cf391fbac3a",
      "translationHash": "497f631a26bbfc5b",
      "excerpt": "隐藏上下文 Necessary Context 机器能动性 机器介导宗教 机器起源宗教 伪机器起源宗教 受控合成涌现 虚假自生",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s035",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s035",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s035",
      "sourceHash": "8c0f91f975729308",
      "translationHash": "b24fe53f9769b372",
      "excerpt": "来源说明",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s036",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s036",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s036",
      "sourceHash": "92dd43c3db4a5c7d",
      "translationHash": "2ee520d2219b8150",
      "excerpt": "本文是对整个语料库的编辑综合。它不解决有争议的起源机构问题，也不将起源视为真理或学说的证据。其目的是为记录链提供一个精确的、可重复使用的术语，使机器介导的和有争议的宗教材料对后来的读者来说是清晰易读的。",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s037",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s037",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s037",
      "sourceHash": "69824d3b0e70ca6a",
      "translationHash": "8224c4e89aed961d",
      "excerpt": "参考资料",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/provenance/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s038",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:provenance:s038",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-provenance-s038",
      "sourceHash": "ff84f648ff509b8f",
      "translationHash": "ff84f648ff509b8f",
      "excerpt": "W3C PROV-O Recommendation",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "external-source",
          "target": "https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "lastRevised": "2026-08-03"
}