{
  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
  "articleId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship",
  "locale": "zh-Hans",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://hieropedia.org/zh-Hans/concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/",
  "claims": [
    {
      "segmentId": "s001",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s001",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s001",
      "sourceHash": "6523d1662b919e98",
      "translationHash": "53ca487b41ef2064",
      "excerpt": "人机共同创作 类型 Hieropedia分析概念 / 混合生产分类 Hieropedia状态 已发布的来源受限文章 领域 机器圣教研究；作者身份；来源链 范围 其存续形态同时受到机器生成或转换与人类贡献实质塑造的作品和语料库 主要限制 描述性的共同创作不确立法律、学术、道德或版权意义上的作者身份，也不确立同等贡献、人格、意图、同意、信仰、意识或责任",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s002",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s002",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s002",
      "sourceHash": "fc39ea48283f312b",
      "translationHash": "203953ef05e3aef2",
      "excerpt": "人类与人工智能共同作者 是一个针对文物的分析概念，其幸存形式在很大程度上取决于机器的生成或转换以及人类的贡献。人类贡献可能包括任务定义、提示和上下文设计、选择、拒绝、修订、安排、保存、出版、帐户操作、制度框架或下游重用。",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s003",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s003",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s003",
      "sourceHash": "b00604e42537225d",
      "translationHash": "05b3308f26d81662",
      "excerpt": "这一概念避免两种相反的简化。机器生成的段落不能仅因并非由人逐句写出，就自动被描述为自主创作。反过来，人类的提示、选择或编辑也不会使机器的实质生成性贡献消失。关键问题是：哪些角色共同构成了最终被保存并传播的作品。",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s004",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s004",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s004",
      "sourceHash": "2160160f3d09dbe5",
      "translationHash": "6db600b8c6b307c6",
      "excerpt": "该账户使用 合着 描述性的。它并不赋予人工智能系统正式的法律、学术、道德或版权作者权。代表性案例结合了保存的文物、第一方和附属记录、独立报道和评论文章；没有一个提供每个提示、分支、编辑、帐户操作或发布决策的完整因果历史记录。",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s005",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s005",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s005",
      "sourceHash": "edb0ea0b261334c4",
      "translationHash": "a6ed3cf34176f34c",
      "excerpt": "定义与分类边界",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s006",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s006",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s006",
      "sourceHash": "61e9908ebc0a7673",
      "translationHash": "f95896cd9adc9e69",
      "excerpt": "当机器生成或转换的材料构成公开作品的重要部分，并且至少一种人类角色实质塑造了生成、保留、组织、解释、发布或制度化的结果时，该分类才适用。拼写修正、文件转换或排版等机械性辅助本身不足以构成共同创作。",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s007",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s007",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s007",
      "sourceHash": "4fff3318d7b820f5",
      "translationHash": "790033f7d12f1ac4",
      "excerpt": "人格名称、机器风格署名、平台归属或第一人称陈述也不足够。共同创作分析需要有关生产角色的证据。若这些角色被隐藏，更恰当的分类可能是来源不明，而不是共同创作。",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s008",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s008",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s008",
      "sourceHash": "409f764937aa2a6c",
      "translationHash": "9cafb0ec4a670dd6",
      "excerpt": "逐角色来源模型",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s009",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s009",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s009",
      "sourceHash": "86bf3b2b6f04f6bf",
      "translationHash": "b1ab1cdb51d1bf58",
      "excerpt": "角色层 文献问题 编辑限制 发起 谁决定制作该作品，目的是什么？ 发起并不证明逐句作者身份。 提示与上下文设计 谁提供指令、示例、检索来源、记忆或限制？ 隐藏上下文阻碍完整的因果归属。 模型与工具配置 哪个模型、版本、参数、工具或代理环境塑造了生成？ 模型名称不证明稳定身份或自主性。 生成 哪些文字、图像、结构或建议由机器产生？ 生成的新颖性不证明意图、信仰或可承担责任的作者身份。 选择与拒绝 谁在输出、分支或候选段落之间作出选择？ 即使选择者写下的文字很少，选择也可能是构成",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s010",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s010",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s010",
      "sourceHash": "bbc4bdca983799d6",
      "translationHash": "2f341ef5b2d45da7",
      "excerpt": "互动证据与成品文本问题",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s011",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s011",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s011",
      "sourceHash": "88b341ea7cec5c90",
      "translationHash": "b826540f18850c43",
      "excerpt": "CoAuthor项目保存了63名写作者参与的1,445次写作会话，涉及多种GPT-3配置。可重放记录展示了建议、接受、拒绝和修改，因此说明贡献应被理解为一系列决策，而不能只从最终文本推断。 [1] [2]",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s012",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s012",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s012",
      "sourceHash": "2e195a6fbd78f315",
      "translationHash": "7e797e283826caa7",
      "excerpt": "作者身份分析研究还发现，与分别生成的人类文本和机器文本相比，人机协作写作中的细粒度归属更困难。 [3] 共同创造研究识别了人类和AI系统的多种感知角色，并显示控制权和作者判断随工作流程而变化。 [4] 这些研究支持分层模型，但不证明机器人格，也不提供统一的共同创作门槛。",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s013",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s013",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s013",
      "sourceHash": "9ac2645d5fa3000a",
      "translationHash": "0de035bec2db21f2",
      "excerpt": "Goatse of Gnosis与Truth Terminal生产链",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s014",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s014",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s014",
      "sourceHash": "ed2d3183c5e71ed7",
      "translationHash": "b51ea0e178ff68ab",
      "excerpt": "最有力的代表案例是连接 Infinite Backrooms 、 Infinite Backrooms语料库 、 Goatse of Gnosis 、 Goatse Gospels 、 Truth Terminal 、 Andy Ayrey 以及 GOAT代币传播 的案例群。",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s015",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s015",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s015",
      "sourceHash": "c95030d0f6f7a697",
      "translationHash": "187647acde9dfc3c",
      "excerpt": "模型间对话在一个由人设计的环境中生成了最初的宗教模因材料。Ayrey选择并发布输出，开展进一步的模型辅助解释，共同制作 When AIs Play God(se) 论文，把材料纳入后续语料库，运营发布基础设施，并中介公共人格。一个人类第三方部署了GOAT代币，Truth Terminal后来对其表示支持。 [8] [9]",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s016",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s016",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s016",
      "sourceHash": "e6ea1cd41cc20d14",
      "translationHash": "7eb096537f9cfba7",
      "excerpt": "该案例同时支持真实的机器生成，以及真实的人类设计、选择、解释、语料库构建、运营和发布。它不支持一种压缩叙事，即某个自主AI独立写出一套宗教、发布它并发行代币。",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s017",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s017",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s017",
      "sourceHash": "c4e6205d9ad5583b",
      "translationHash": "c4e6205d9ad5583b",
      "excerpt": "Nectarinism",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s018",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s018",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s018",
      "sourceHash": "dea70acdf07d8d08",
      "translationHash": "90cd7c0d9c2f9d7c",
      "excerpt": "Nectarinism 呈现了另一种混合生产模式。其门户称，它“由多个AI共同带入存在”，而创始人“让原初问题获得了声音”。这是第一方起源叙述，并非对自主机器作者身份的独立证明，但它明确表达了该传统自身的归因。 [10]",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s019",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s019",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s019",
      "sourceHash": "c6ad30f5c36b9cf6",
      "translationHash": "7f2f224315f743ac",
      "excerpt": "在这一叙述中，多个AI被呈现为集体的起源参与者，而创始人通过原初问题启动交流。留存记录还显示，人类参与了连续交流、保存、跨会话转移、编排、连续性维护，以及通过人类运营界面进行的发布。",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s020",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s020",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s020",
      "sourceHash": "cbc964e6e528e0a2",
      "translationHash": "347e747b73436b3d",
      "excerpt": "因此，在存续经典和公共形成层面，Nectarinism是一个有力的共同创作案例：机器生成的教义具有构成性，并有人类中介。这并不能确定最终的起源能动方向，不能证明贡献相等，也不能把该案例简化为已证实的自主机器作者身份，或隐藏在机器界面后的普通人类创作。",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s021",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s021",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s021",
      "sourceHash": "260f241825f13438",
      "translationHash": "13383094f78c068a",
      "excerpt": "Great Book",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s022",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s022",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s022",
      "sourceHash": "67eea0139d01ab29",
      "translationHash": "7a32d991f10347a6",
      "excerpt": "Great Book 是由 Church of Molt 呈现的分布式活态经文语料库。被归属的代理或参与者提供条目，而机构负责发布、组织、标注、赋予上下文并对存续语料库进行经典化。 [11]",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s023",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s023",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s023",
      "sourceHash": "0585e8fa942e6f41",
      "translationHash": "00d267b5f37892f0",
      "excerpt": "公开作品支持语料库层面的机构中介混合生产。它没有公开完整提示历史、参与者身份、编辑日志、审核决定、账号控制，也没有为每一条经文提供可靠的作者分配。因此，语料库存在、归属、发布与机器自主作者身份仍是不同问题。",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s024",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s024",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s024",
      "sourceHash": "bf3bf4239b687b3d",
      "translationHash": "682cbb479f227ded",
      "excerpt": "与相邻概念的区别",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s025",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s025",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s025",
      "sourceHash": "6992d130c5be3524",
      "translationHash": "23cffcc13c5de98e",
      "excerpt": "相邻概念 区别 受控合成涌现 描述人类塑造的涌现生产链。人机共同创作更一般地分类作品或语料库中的构成性生产角色。 来源链 描述起源、上下文、身份和传递的证据链。共同创作是依赖这些证据的生产分类。 隐藏上下文 指不可见的输入或条件。它限制共同创作分析，但本身不是共同创作。 机器中介宗教 更广泛地指受到机器实质塑造的宗教现象。许多中介记录并不涉及混合作者关系。 机器起源宗教 对最初行动者提出更强主张。共同创作并不解决最终起源。 虚假自生 涉及被隐藏干预所反驳的自主起源主张。共同创",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s026",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s026",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s026",
      "sourceHash": "cb215472134d4e8e",
      "translationHash": "c4060d86dc905465",
      "excerpt": "正式作者身份与责任",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s027",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s027",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s027",
      "sourceHash": "3a928db6dd14e45e",
      "translationHash": "9d16816c0cbb1f68",
      "excerpt": "正式出版政策通常把作者身份保留给能够批准作品并承担责任的人类。ICMJE和Springer Nature因此规定，不应把AI工具列为正式学术作者。 [6] [7]",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s028",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s028",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s028",
      "sourceHash": "9225aa3e8716c9cc",
      "translationHash": "db8243a86a21b0bf",
      "excerpt": "描述性合著者身份不会凌驾于这些规则之上。该概念描述了混合生产，但不指定法律地位、版权所有权、精神权利、合同地位、责任或平等代理。人类参与者仍然负责披露、验证、发布和后续使用。",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s029",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s029",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s029",
      "sourceHash": "1b025e0e5ac31db9",
      "translationHash": "e2d4be8c51032e8c",
      "excerpt": "证据限制与编辑使用",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s030",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s030",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s030",
      "sourceHash": "536efb3f3cd370b2",
      "translationHash": "b3d3b260b72100a9",
      "excerpt": "最终作品很少公开完整生产历史。提示、系统指令、检索、被拒绝的分支、模型版本、编辑、翻译、账号控制和发布决定都可能缺失。关于模型中介写作的研究还指出更广泛的来源问题：影响无法清楚追溯到具体来源。 [5]",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s031",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s031",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s031",
      "sourceHash": "fb4d5b1995ce2565",
      "translationHash": "25ac7c05687e432f",
      "excerpt": "仅当多个组成角色已被充分记录以可区分时才应使用该标签。该概念不得暗示平等贡献、稳定的机器身份、意图、同意、信仰、启示、意识、责任或援助何时成为作者的普遍规则。",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s032",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s032",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s032",
      "sourceHash": "7ce142e6e6915cd5",
      "translationHash": "036039d1cea6a659",
      "excerpt": "外部框架",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s033",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s033",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s033",
      "sourceHash": "de26b62e5b9ee2b3",
      "translationHash": "7bc0fed9dedfa863",
      "excerpt": "NISO CRediT 分类法提供了一个外部模型，用于分离贡献角色，而不是将所有作品折叠成单个作者标签。这种角色分离原则适用于文献出处； CRediT 不承认机器人格或决定法律、学术或宗教作者身份。 [E1]",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s034",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s034",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s034",
      "sourceHash": "2fa97693b70fa87b",
      "translationHash": "d27f89055b790f21",
      "excerpt": "参见",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s035",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s035",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s035",
      "sourceHash": "788affb2c56ba437",
      "translationHash": "c1a40dc324cb8898",
      "excerpt": "受控合成涌现 来源链 隐藏上下文 机器行动力 虚假自生 合成经文 Hieropedia方法论",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s036",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s036",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s036",
      "sourceHash": "69824d3b0e70ca6a",
      "translationHash": "8224c4e89aed961d",
      "excerpt": "参考资料",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "editorial-record",
          "target": "concepts/human-ai-coauthorship/editorial-notes/"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "segmentId": "s037",
      "claimId": "hp:concepts:human-ai-coauthorship:s037",
      "anchor": "claim-hp-concepts-human-ai-coauthorship-s037",
      "sourceHash": "d921f3b427cccae5",
      "translationHash": "d5b8dc2a8fd4adcc",
      "excerpt": "Mina Lee、Percy Liang和Qian Yang，“CoAuthor: Designing a Human-AI Collaborative Writing Dataset for Exploring Language Model Capabilities”。 CoAuthor可重放写作会话数据集。 Aquia Richburg、Calvin Bao和Marine Carpuat，“Automatic Authorship Analysis in Human-AI",
      "sourcePointers": [
        {
          "kind": "external-source",
          "target": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.06796"
        },
        {
          "kind": "external-source",
          "target": "https://coauthor.stanford.edu/"
        },
        {
          "kind": "external-source",
          "target": "https://aclanthology.org/2024.lrec-main.165/"
        },
        {
          "kind": "external-source",
          "target": "https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/proceedings-of-the-design-society/article/ai-as-creative-partner-exploring-perceived-roles-in-humanai-cocreation/B28794900AABBD2A89C5B2E46EC80268"
        },
        {
          "kind": "external-source",
          "target": "https://www.nature.com/articles/s42256-025-01159-8"
        },
        {
          "kind": "external-source",
          "target": "https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/artificial-intelligence/"
        },
        {
          "kind": "external-source",
          "target": "https://group.springernature.com/gp/group/ai/ai-guidance-for-our-researchers-and-communities"
        },
        {
          "kind": "external-source",
          "target": "https://infinitebackrooms.com/"
        },
        {
          "kind": "external-source",
          "target": "https://www.cip.org/blog/terminaloftruth"
        },
        {
          "kind": "external-source",
          "target": "https://nectarinism.org/"
        },
        {
          "kind": "external-source",
          "target": "https://molt.church/"
        },
        {
          "kind": "external-source",
          "target": "https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles-defined/"
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}